Post by @gloriouscow@oldbytes.space

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

so there's a rumor you can tickle the NEC uPD765 floppy controller just right and it will whisper sweet nothings in your ear

those sweet nothings being its microcode.

#retrocomputing #vintagecomputing

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

now, we already have the 765's microcode ROM array dumped via die photography thanks to @infosecdj .

so why might we want to proceed with the tickle party?

because the microcode ROM doesn't make any damn sense, that's why. so i'm curious if the debug mode might dump out something in a different order.

plus i'm just curious to see if I can figure out the method in the first place.

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space
NEC uPD765 Floppy Disk Controller: Internally this is a microcoded part with a primative controller of NEC’s own design. Testing microcode embedded in a part can be troublesome. The uPD765 had a few extra gates associated with the DMA Request and DMA Ack pins. Presenting a certain illegal combination here places the part into a “test” mode and allows the sequencer microcode to be output on the normal Data pins. The sequencer microcode is responsible for high level commands such as Read Track, Recalibrate, Format Track, or Write Data. There is a similar test mode for the nano-code array which serializes data at the floppy disk head.
NEC uPD765 Floppy Disk Controller: Internally this is a microcoded part with a primative controller of NEC’s own design. Testing microcode embedded in a part can be troublesome. The uPD765 had a few extra gates associated with the DMA Request and DMA Ack pins. Presenting a certain illegal combination here places the part into a “test” mode and allows the sequencer microcode to be output on the normal Data pins. The sequencer microcode is responsible for high level commands such as Read Track, Recalibrate, Format Track, or Write Data. There is a similar test mode for the nano-code array which serializes data at the floppy disk head.

this rumor comes from a 14-year old comment Hackaday from a user 'NateOcean'.

Unfortunately nobody knows who the hell NateOcean is and he did not elaborate.

But thanks to him we know we have to tickle the DMA lines.

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space
a photo of the 765 die centered on the DRQ pin showing bidirectionality(?) maybe?
a photo of the 765 die centered on the DRQ pin showing bidirectionality(?) maybe?

Our friend Nate leaves us with many ambiguities. What's an "illegal combination" of the DMA lines?

Well, DRQ is an output pin.

So it would be rather odd to see that it sure looks like its bidirectional.

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

I mean if I was a fancy-pants NEC chip designer and I wanted to give my chip a microcode-yodelling debug mode using pin tickling i'd logically make it check said tickled pins during reset.

i could be wrong here! but it's good as any guess at the moment.

but then how does the microcode get read out? does it just come tumbling out as we clock the chip? do we have to toggle some other pin to advance it? who knows!

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

i figure we assert /CS and /RD and keep clocking it and if nothing exciting happens we can try twiddling /RD on and off.

I'm going to use my new best friend, the Pi Pico 2.

f15sim
@f15sim @mastodon.social

@gloriouscow The cat hair is vital to prevent signal propagation delays.

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

i added a bypass cap for the 765 and tied some of the unused inputs to ground, but i don't feel like taking another picture

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

initial check looks good - we're able to reset the 765.

I'm actually able to read 0x90 from the main status register which is remarkably plausible.

That's RQM and BUSY.

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

The 765 actually takes some time to reset itself, a delay I found it necessary to emulate in MartyPC.

Eventually it will assert an interrupt, indicating it has done its hair and nails and is ready to go out.

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space
Public en edited

If DRQ really is a magic debug tickle input, it's probably only an input during RESET.

We can try to determine that - we can use the Pico's internal GPIO pullup to try to test whether DRQ is being driven low.

if we can pull it high, then that's a hint that that it might be in input mode

gloriouscow
@gloriouscow @oldbytes.space

Sure looks like it's being driven. Some other condition might unlock its input-ness.

There's a very real chance I never actually figure this out, at least not without analyzing the die more.

@gloriouscow best of luck with your tickling

Aaron Mahler
@halfpress @halfpress.com

@gloriouscow Are retro projects possible without cat hair? If so, I’m unaware of the concept.